Guide to Writing more Scientifically

Math riddle: playing with infinite series

Since I haven't had that much time to work on new posts (there's also a follow up on the previous post already that I hope I can publish soon), I thought I show you a math riddle that I find quite amusing and interesting because the calculations beeing made here are completely valid (no hidden 0-divisions or tricks of that sort). I've shown this to a couple of mathematicians and they have also been surprised.

So, without further ado, here it is:


As we may intuitively think, the statement about this series seems accurate:
1+2+4+8+16+...=i=02i=
...but is it really ? Let's break it down: we can multiply the same sum by 1 without altering the result, so
1+2+4+8+16+...=1×(1+2+4+8+16+...)
Since 1=21, we can replace it in the equation above like so:
1×(1+2+4+8+16+...)=(21)×(1+2+4+8+16+...)
Pretty basic right? Let us now apply the distributive property to get this:
(21)×(1+2+4+8+16+...)=2×(1+2+4+8+16+...)1×(1+2+4+8+16+...)
...and if we get rid of the parenthesis we'll get something like this:
=2+4+8+16+32+...12481632...
You may have noticed already that all the numbers in the left, cancel out with all numbers in the right, except for a remaining -1:
2+4+8+16+32+...12481632...
2+4+8+16+32+...12481632...
2+4+8+16+32+...12481632...=1
Since we come from a series of equalities, we can safely conclude that:
i=02i=1
Fun, isn't it?

If the intuitive notation for the series (1+2+4+8+...) bothers you, you can replace it by any name you want, lets say S:
1+2+4+8+...=i=02i=S

An alternative way to get the same result is to take the common factor 2 out of the series (starting from the second term of course) like so:
S=1+2+4+8+16+...=1+2(1+2+4+8+...)=1+2S
and from here is just a matter of letting  the S on both sides cancel out and you'll get a nice contradiction:
S=1+2S
2SS=1
S=1
...and that's how it's done.

Comments